ALERT: IS YOUR VOTE COMPROMISED?

Despite millions of calls to switch back to strictly paper ballots, lawmakers have still not heeded the calls and warnings of computer experts. It came to my attention this friday that in Pinellas County, Florida- A duo of viruses were introduced to the network of ballot stations, bringing into question the validity of the vote.

Two pieces of malicious software were recently discovered on voting stations across Pinellas County.The two bugs, known as Flush.G and W32.SillyDC, work in tandem and go from computer to computer redirecting Internet browsers to sites the user hasn't selected, officials said. The worm is carried through removable media like USB drives, is easily detected and, officials say, rather harmless.

Pinellas Deputy Supervisor of Elections Rick Becker said the worm isn't the kind of Trojan horse that would be used to corrupt a computer voting system and was unsure just where it came from.

Many E-Voting companies love to market the security of their products, stating that since they are not connected to an external internet, that they are exempt from exploitation. However, a proof of concept attack was done by Princeton students against the DieBold voting machines. In this attack, they introduced a virus which self-propogated throughout the systems and switched votes from candidate A or candidate B, and gave them to candidate C.

Are you tired of feeling like your vote doesn't matter? Write to your state or local congressman and encourage them to switch to strictly paper voting.

Microsoft Vista Security... Yeah Right!

Lately, Microsoft has been trumping the myriad of new security measures that have been included in Windows Vista. However, IT techs have been screaming their guts out that between the lack of any substantial changes (aside from a circular start bar), the forced User Account Control, and big brother like computing- That everyone should stay with XP. Well, now we have actual basis for this. Notice how that Microsoft is quick to shift ALL the blame to the incompetent user.  

                The claim that Vista is less secure than Windows 2000 was made last week by security vendor PC Tools, which said that over the past six months Vista had suffered 639 unique threats, whereas Windows 2000 has suffered 586. PC Tools's research was conducted by collecting data from customers using its ThreatFire behavioural detection software. "Ironically, the new operating system has been hailed by Microsoft as the most secure version of Windows to date," said Simon Clausen, the chief executive of PC Tools last week. "However, recent research conducted with statistics from over 1.4 million computers within the ThreatFire community has shown that Windows Vista is more susceptible to malware than the eight-year-old Windows 2000 operating system, and only 37 percent more secure than Windows XP," Clausen said.

        However, Microsoft strongly hit back at the claims, blaming users for executing malicious code on their machines. On Tuesday, Technet blogger and Microsoft evangelist Michael Kleef said the number of infections found by PC Tools was an indication of poor user behaviour


639 unique threats? This coming from the billion dollar brain-trust that spent four years to develop a circular start bar? I am truly, truly stunned.

Hacker Safe?

Please, don't be lulled into a sense of false security just because a website has the hacker-safe logo on it. "Why not?" You ask me, BECAUSE- *DURRRRR* NOTHING IS HACKER SAFE. But why specifically? The hacker safe certification is a subscription program through various Companies, and although your favorite "Adult" website may be hacker safe when you register. This doesn't mean it will be two weeks down the road. What they companies do is they test each registered website every day using a automatic program, and if they find problems they will tell the website. Thats it, they dont fix it, force the website to take down the certification, nothing- they just say "Hey theres a problem." Dont Believe me?

Geeks Get PwN3D

Geeks.com is a $150 million company specializing in the sale of excess inventory and manufacturers' closeouts. Its Web site says that it is tested on a daily basis by ScanAlert Inc., which offers a service that constantly monitors sites for vulnerabilities.

But ScanAlert spokesman Nigel Ravenhill said via e-mail last week that the vendor, which is being acquired by McAfee Inc., had withdrawn its Hacker Safe certification from Geeks.com "several times" last year after finding vulnerabilities in the retailer's systems. Geeks.com fell out of compliance last June and again in December, he said.

The compromised information included names, addresses, telephone numbers and Visa credit card numbers, according to a copy of the letter posted on The Consumerist blog.

Now, What are the implications of this break in? Am I telling you that you should be a paranoid schizo when doing business on the internet? DUH. A wise man once told me "Putting your credit card on the Internet is like putting your naughty parts in a wood grinder." Although its not the most glamorous quote in the world, its true. Listen to the man, dont stick your wah-wah in the wood grinder.